SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 29 | July | 2000 ]

>> Next Message >>


Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 01:18:46 PDT
From: "Steven Levine" <steve53@earthlink.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: D-Link PnP Challenges Tekram SCSI To Steel Cage DSL Match

=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================

In <3982721D.599A@peterskye.com>, on 07/28/00
at 10:57 PM, Peter Skye said:

>Well ... I didn't give you any _wrong_ information! So I guess I only
>gave you right information. :)))

OK, fine, We can let your pain drag out as long as you wish. Just as
long as you are right.

>But I want to _lock_ the NIC IRQ so it won't "shift around" if there's
>any future hardware changes. Removing IRQ 12 from the "available" list
>doesn't do that.

Shifting IRQ's on PCI devices are not the problem. Undected use of IRQ's
by ISA devices is. Solve that problem and shift IRQ's don't matter.

>The NIC IRQ is included in the PROTOCOL.INI file, yes? So if the IRQ

You can't specify it for the NIC. It's not an option.

>(The PnP IRQ assignment _might_ shift if cards were added or removed, if
>cards were moved between slots, or if the motherboard was changed.)

Yes, that is why I suggested you shift the cards around, as a possible
solution.

Steven

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Steven Levine" MR2/ICE 2.19zk #10183 Warp4/FP11
www.scoug.com irc.webbnet.org #scoug (Wed 7pm PST)
----------------------------------------------------------------

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


>> Next Message >>

Return to [ 29 | July | 2000 ]