SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-General Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 08 | October | 1998 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 13:12:09 PDT
From: Steve and Melanie Schiffman <schiffman@ibm.net >
Reply-To: scoug-general@scoug.com
To: scoug-general@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-General: RAID i/o speed

Content Type: text/plain

Wirtz, Paul wrote:
>
> That's a whole set of articles to answer that question fully.

I have an article on RAID that I aquired a couple of years ago. If I can
find it again, I will make a copy for you.

>
> The short answer is for a single user instead of a server not much speed
> increase. much less chance of data loss.

I agree with Paul's assesment that RAID is intended to provide data
redundency and therefore avoids data loss when there is a hardware
failure. It does not protect against a software I/O subsystem failure in
all cases. Learned this first hand at my last assignment where a Netware
server software was failing and all 60megs of data had to be restored
from the tape backups.

Peter asks if RAID is faster. If I recall from the material I have seen,
RAID can be slower on writes, while faster on reads. This occurs on RAID
level 1 and 2 because the data has to be written twice. There is more
overhead to doing multiple writes for a data sector whereas a read only
has to be done once and can come from which ever drive can respond the
quickest.

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Skye [mailto:pskye@peterskye.com]
>
> I want to know what increase in I/O speed I'll get if I install RAID (I
> know there are various "levels", or kinds, of RAID, and I know they have
> different technologies so their I/O speeds are different).

There is also software RAID vs hardware RAID.

>
> Does anyone have any hands-on experience with any RAID installations,
> and if so can you tell me what speed increase I could expect?
>
Expect a decrease in speed for writes, an increase for reads. You will
not be able to see the difference on a single user system. For a Server
running reasonably moderate loads and above, reads will be improved.

=====================================================

To unsubscribe to this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-general".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 08 | October | 1998 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.