SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 25 | 
February | 
2002 ]
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
 
 
 
Content Type:   text/plain 
=====================================================  
If you are responding to someone asking for help who  
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the  
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.  
=====================================================  
 
 
I wrote:  
 
> > Is there some particular reason you need to go with one of the later drivers ?  I can't quote the version  
> offhand, but I'm using a 7800FAM set dated 4/8/99.  
 
Rocky responded:  
 
> I don't think this is the same version as what I am playing with (the files in  
> the archive have 5-1-01 dates).  However, I'd still like to know what version  
> your driver reports itself as at boot time?  Either a /V is needed after the BASEDEV statement or you need to  
> hunt around the file with a hex editor.  I'd like to know which one you're  
> having good luck with.  
 
Sometimes a driver, lib file, or even an executable won't show a version you can find with a hex editor (which  
is really annoying), due to some kinda "stealth" coding, an absent-minded programmer, or who knows why.  
Fortunately  I think this wasn't one of those.  I found the string  
 
#OEM:9.50#@ Adaptec 7800 Family Driver for OS/2 (d2.4 990408)  
 
inside the AIC7870.ADD I'm using, and  
 
#OEM:9.50#@ Adaptec 7800 Family Ultra2 Driver for OS/2 (d4.12 990408)  
 
inside the AIC78U2.  
 
I can't recall what else might have been problemmatical, other than Compare operations failing when using the  
then current CDS product on tape backups, but the problems went away after I plugged in this version from their  
site.  I sort of doubt it's still there, but if so maybe there is still some explanatory info regarding this.  
(FWIW, I don't recall BackMaster ever having this problem, regardless of the driver version in use.)  
 
> I agree with using what works - see my other e-mail about the kind of quirks I  
> was experiencing.  I think your 2940U is very much like my 2920C except maybe for  
> the supplied connector complement.  The version that reports itself as 2.3 is  
> what works for me (so far).  
 
You are welcome to the version I have here.  Just let me know.  I don't plan on changing it until / unless  
there is some compelling reason to do so.  (I'm not by nature an experimenter, like our fine feathered friend .  
. . . )  
 
Jordan  
 
 
 
=====================================================  
 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message  
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,  
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".  
 
For problems, contact the list owner at  
"rollin@scoug.com".  
 
=====================================================  
 
  
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 25 | 
February | 
2002 ] 
  
  
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
 P.O. Box 26904
 Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
 
 |