SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 26 |
June |
2002 ]
<< Previous Message <<
Content Type: text/plain
=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================
Hello
Yes, today was a good day ;-)
This morning, after Steven's reply, I tried again with RSU ...
... and see: Everthing starts smooth but during the FPinst
process again I got an RC1 !
Checked the log and restarted again !
Some problems with one of an *.msg file !?
OK, I got the message that the previous installation didn't
end properly and I was asked to retry: YES, I did !
This time it worked properly but, checked with IPT, still FP15 !?
Well, I tried the 3rd time !
Well, everthing went perfect and smooth !
Well, IPT also shows FP16 installed now !
Do not ask how and why it was not working yesterday !?
I accessed the same URL's and my system was unchanged.
Also RSU was on most accurate level yesterday before I started !
Now both my similar C: partitions (PROD & TEST environment)
are up to date again ;-)
Steven and Gary, thanks for your assistance & comments !
Now I am ready to prepare for my new server-like P2P HDD and
partition topgraphy.
Good evening,
svobi
gary.wong@sbcglobal.net on 26.06.2002 15.29.34
Please respond to scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
cc:
Subject: SCOUG-Help: newest QF ?
If case this has something to do with your problem, the latest
RSU utility was updated
July 30, 2001. Go to
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/ps/products/os2/rsu/rsuinstn.exe.
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 01:17:55 PST7, Info2SYNass.NET wrote:
>=====================================================
>If you are responding to someone asking for help who
>may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
>REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
>=====================================================
>
>Hi Steven
>Thanks for your very quick reply.
>
>An earlier application of a FP with RSU went very smooth but
>with this FP16 I am struggling not the first time now.
>
>Yesterdays experience:
>RSU, tried many times, always resulted in some RC's like 11, 50
>...
>... so I tried, also many times, downloading the dsk files but
>working with QF I always got one or more CRC errors and
>did not continue, of course.
>
>This morning, before I finally wrote to SCOUG-Help, I had
already
>tried some time more: NO success.
>
>Earlier processes with RSU as also with QF were done well ...
>... but these days I am having frustrations only ;-((
>
>Will quote into your following reply:
>
>
>>In <1025093519-0-Info@SYNass.NET>, on 06/25/02
>> at 10:12 PM, "Info2SYNass.NET" said:
>
>>>Yesterday I tried downloading, unzipping and installing FP16
>per RSU but
>>>ran into some problems showing RC50.
>>>Even many retries with changing the partitions didn't work.
>>>
>>>Finally I downloaded the diskettes immages and tried with QF !
>It worked
>>>but again I ran into problems ...
>>>... some CRC errors and the suggestion not to continue !
>
>
>>Either you have download problems or FP16 uses a packing method
>that QF's
>>dskxtrct does not understand. Does loaddskf unpack the images
>correctly?
>
>I am not sure and I do not know really
>
>
>>>1999/11/17 23:40:04 61641 qf12.cmd
>>
>There's:
>>
>> qf123 .zip 88,056 .... 1-20-00 14:25:56
>>
>>probably on Hobbes.
>
>I already checked with Google before writing in ...
>... Hobbes shows no QF nor Quickfix ;-((
>
>
>>However, I suspect you would be better served to correct your
>RSU problem.
>>It's usually pretty reliable and when it does fail, it provides
>useful
>>error messages. A better description of how and when RSU fails
>with RC50
>>will probably facilitate getting RSU up and running for you.
>
>You are correct !
>The RSU method is really comfortable and easy if it works ...
>... but horrible if it doesn't
>
>About RC50: I used an empty 10GB partition to apply FP16 with RSU
>...
>... but it still complains about space !?
>
>Another curiousity: The unpacking of xr_m016.*dk files with QF
>always
>ends with one or more CRC error(s) but not continuing the process
>also
>erases all the files in the qfos2 directory except the log file !
>So I am unable to save the good files and retry with the bad
>one(s) only !
>
>I will do some further tries now ...
>... with no success I will stay on FP15 till changing to 4.52
>soon !?
>
>Once again, thanks for your hints and suggestions
>svobi
>
>************************************************************
>*** >>> Say NO to HTML in Mail and News <<< ***
>*** ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ***
>*** >>> AGAINST TERROR +++ AGAINST WAR <<< ***
>************************************************************
>
>=====================================================
>
>To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
>to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
>put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
>
>For problems, contact the list owner at
>"rollin@scoug.com"
************************************************************
*** >>> Say NO to HTML in Mail and News <<< ***
*** ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ***
*** >>> AGAINST TERROR +++ AGAINST WAR <<< ***
************************************************************
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
Return to [ 26 |
June |
2002 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
|