SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 10 | March | 2002 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 20:14:29 PST7
From: <leganii@surfree.com >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: Re: Legan vs. Levine: The IFS= Steel Cage Match !!

Content Type: text/plain

=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================

I've dragged out the B&W little monitor and rerun
Umpire Duck's experiment locally.
My results seem to confirm his,
especially that the IFS and DEVICE statements
seem to run in strict order encountered in the
CONFIG.SYS file as a single group, as far as I can tell.

I don't know of any ECHO.SYS driver, but the
EXT2-OS2.IFS prints out some messages when things get to
it, which doesn't seem to indicate any stacking/processing
steps.

One statement that is obviously being processed in different
order from what Azzerito and Green state is the
'PAUSEONERROR=YES|NO' "Performance" statement, which goes into effect
some time before the DEVICE/IFS scan.
I tried both values. No effect on BASEDEV's.
This one statement might be an exception, but it does
seem to back up Levine's idea that the "Performances"'s might be processed
before the DEVICE/IFS stuff.

Another statement obviously *processed* in another order than
than what A&G give, at least for being read, is PROTSHELL=.
It might be read with PAUSEONERROR, when A&Z state (Performance group),
or after the CALL/RUN stuff, but it does not effect things
till good and ready, at the end of bootup.

I probably should rerun the experiment, but seem to recall the

RUN=...SUBSTHST.EXE

kicks out a message (and ad actually :-) ) on running also,
which is maybe why I presumed the RUN='s
went sometime before CALL='s.
It has never shown up during or after CALL='s.

Regards,
Dallas E. Legan II / leganii@surfree.com / dallasii@kincyb.com

Powered by......Lynx, the Internet at hyperkinetic speed.

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 10 | March | 2002 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.