SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 13 | May | 2002 ]

<< Previous Message <<


Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 11:30:10 PST7
From: "J. R. Fox" <jr_fox@pacbell.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: Re: Partitioning Scheme

Content Type: text/plain

=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================

Ray Davison replied to me:

> > This in fact turned out to be one of the giant banana peels we kept skidding
> > on for quite some time. SC will apparently make no difference in this regard.
> > This does not bode at all well for my original plan, which was to drop ECS
> > into L:, decidedly beyond that point.
> >
> Why do you want to?
> What is your reaction to my suggested layout?

That works for you; the scheme I planned (which Tony outlined in his posts a
week or so ago) works for me. By this point, I'm heavily invested in my partition-
ing scheme, which is closely based on the scheme from my old boot drive, albeit
with some larger partition sizes. In a way, it becomes a house of cards, and
tinkering with it screws up everything else. I really wanted to place ECS just
where indicated. It was relayed to me that Steven had said something about
this _maybe_ being possible, using a Testcase kernel (plus a bootloader, a la
NT/W2K ?). If so, I'm still not sure I want to build a production ECS partition
around something that complex and possibly unstable.

The much less appealing alternatives I see are as follows: At the moment, I have an
empty 500M., alternate primary C:, and a DOS App.s D: of the same size whose
contents could perhaps be merged into another partition which mostly contains DOS
App.s. It would then be contiguous -- no need for using ad-hoc volumes. But that
would only free up 1Gig, for ECS, and I had planned on having it in a 2G partition.
It might also be possible to place ECS on the 2nd., smaller hard drive (which is far
less rigorously spoken for), enough below the 8G. point that it would boot. But I'd
still rather do it per the original plan.

Jordan

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message <<

Return to [ 13 | May | 2002 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.