SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

>> Next Message >>

Date:	Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:16:14 PST8
From:	Harry Chris Motin <hmotin@attglobal.net >
Reply-To:	scoug-help@scoug.com
To:	scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject:	SCOUG-Help: Installing TCPIP

Content Type: text/plain

=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================

Steven,

Thanks for your responses to Peter's questions and mine. I'm now in the
process of reviewing the readme and online info files for the stack and
apps update to TCPIP 4.1. I'll probably elect to update/install.
HCM

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Steven Levine wrote:
>
> =====================================================
> If you are responding to someone asking for help who
> may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
> REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
> =====================================================
>
> In <3E637363.335D@peterskye.com>, on 03/03/03
> at 07:28 AM, Peter Skye said:
>
> >I'm at W4FP10 with 4.02y and 16-bit MPTS. What are the benefits of going
> >to 32-bit MPTS? What are the additional benefits of then going to 32-bit
> >TCP/IP?
>
> The 32-bit MPTS offers better overall performance and new features such as
> the built-in firewall. It is the best supported stack, so defect fixes
> are more likely, if needed. Of course, overal performance depends on more
> than just the TCP/IP stack. The NIC/driver combo may be the true
> performance bottleneck. The same comments apply to the 32-bit TCP/IP
> apps. IMO, there's no reason not to run the 32-bit MPTS stack. The
> benefits of the 32-bit TCP/IP apps for a setup like yours, at the low end
> of the utilization scale, are less clear.
>
> For those with SWC or eCS, the choice is obvious. One runs the the 32-bit
> versions of both because they are part of the MCP and they are as fully
> tested as anything else in that configuration.
>
> Steven
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Steven Levine" MR2/ICE 2.35 #10183 Warp4/FP15/14.085_W4
> www.scoug.com irc.webbnet.org #scoug (Wed 7pm PST)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> =====================================================
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
> to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
> put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
>
> For problems, contact the list owner at
> "rollin@scoug.com".
>
> =====================================================

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================

Return to [ 04 | March | 2003 ]

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.