SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 11 |
May |
2003 ]
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Content Type: text/plain
=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================
Harry Motin wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2003 09:24:04 PDT7, J. R. Fox wrote:
>
> >to prevent) much easier. It may also be a superior quality of service. I do
> >recall that PPoE was considered quite kludgy, and a PITA for OS/2 users.
> >There wasn't much support for it. I could well be wrong, but that's how I
> >remember it.
>
> I'm no expert here, but I think that there may not have been much hardware and
> software support for PPPoE. For example, I recently bought the Injoy firewall. Their
> latest version, the one I got, only now supports PPPoE.
> HCM
Yes, as best I can recall, PPPoE was for awhile Windoze supported only, then, later, it
was -- for US -- Injoy or nothing. I don't know whether or not that is still the case.
I can tell you that -- given a choice -- I would always pick a static address over the
DHCP variety, even if it meant paying a few bucks a month extra. I couldn't recite for
you the gory details, but I remember being told that one's Home-Network-with-internet-
connections-for-each-box options were clearly better with a Static IP. Specifically,
that
you could set up certain things that the ISP would otherwise much rather prevent, or
charge you a lot extra for. (That may have more to do with running Sites or servers
from
home -- I'm not sure. It's ultimately a bandwidth usage issue, I believe.)
Jordan
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 11 |
May |
2003 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
|