SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 11 | May | 2003 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 10:53:43 PDT7
From: "J. R. Fox" <jr_fox@pacbell.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: Harry Motin <hmotin@sbcglobal.net > , scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: Re: Static IP

Content Type: text/plain

=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================

Harry Motin wrote:

> On Tue, 6 May 2003 09:24:04 PDT7, J. R. Fox wrote:
>
> >to prevent) much easier. It may also be a superior quality of service. I do
> >recall that PPoE was considered quite kludgy, and a PITA for OS/2 users.
> >There wasn't much support for it. I could well be wrong, but that's how I
> >remember it.
>
> I'm no expert here, but I think that there may not have been much hardware and
> software support for PPPoE. For example, I recently bought the Injoy firewall. Their
> latest version, the one I got, only now supports PPPoE.
> HCM

Yes, as best I can recall, PPPoE was for awhile Windoze supported only, then, later, it
was -- for US -- Injoy or nothing. I don't know whether or not that is still the case.
I can tell you that -- given a choice -- I would always pick a static address over the
DHCP variety, even if it meant paying a few bucks a month extra. I couldn't recite for
you the gory details, but I remember being told that one's Home-Network-with-internet-
connections-for-each-box options were clearly better with a Static IP. Specifically,
that
you could set up certain things that the ISP would otherwise much rather prevent, or
charge you a lot extra for. (That may have more to do with running Sites or servers
from
home -- I'm not sure. It's ultimately a bandwidth usage issue, I believe.)

Jordan

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 11 | May | 2003 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.