SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 05 |
September |
2003 ]
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Content Type: text/plain
=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================
So what are you planning to get (make & model)?
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:10:53 PDT7, Gary Granat wrote:
>=====================================================
>If you are responding to someone asking for help who
>may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
>REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
>=====================================================
>
>On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 06:07:36 PDT7, Mark Abramowitz wrote:
>
>>>Not a chance. Should I construe this to be your estimate that processor
>>>speed is a nonissue?
>>
>>I'm no expert, but I can't understand why this should matter. Perhaps the
>>reference is because of the packaged software and drivers - I've seen lots
>>of hardware that does this.
>
>and...
>
>On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:58:17 PDT7, Steven Levine wrote:
>
>>>Not a chance. Should I construe this to be your estimate that processor
>>>speed is a nonissue?
>>
>>Pretty much. I read these kinds of statements more as a measure of the
>>CPU power needed to run the bundled Windows apps.
>
>Thanks to you both. That clears up a bunch of anxiety. Off hand, I couldn't
>see how the basic function of the CD-RW drive was processor speed dependent (up
>to a point, I suppose -- the system has to be able to feed the data to the
>drive at some reasonable speed) but no one bothers to advertise that. Oh,
>well...
>
>Steven further said:
>
>>One thing that no one has really mentioned is that there are just a few
>>manufacturers of CD-RW drive mechanisms. Most of what you buy will be a
>>rebadged version of one of these base drives.
>
>Interesting point. One thing I read yesterday (and I can't recall just where)
>claimed that a particular Plextor model was a rebadged NEC drive. The author
>of the comment didn't think much of the firmware, for some reason. This came
>from a German source, and it seemed to me that there was a preoccupation with
>firmware updates and firmware quality.
>
>Anyway, I'm getting ready to commit in the next day or two, probably. I have
>appreciated the thoughts and assistance from all concerned.
>
>--gary
>=====================
>ggranat@earthlink.net
>
>
>=====================================================
>
>To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
>to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
>put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
>
>For problems, contact the list owner at
>"rollin@scoug.com".
>
>=====================================================
>
>
>
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 05 |
September |
2003 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
|