SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 04 | June | 2003 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:54:37 PDT7
From: "J. R. Fox" <jr_fox@pacbell.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: Re:

Content Type: text/plain

=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================

Steve wrote:

> Memory prices have dropped so much that HD manufacturers
> are now including larger caches on their high-end offerings.
> Soon, 8MB caches will be standard.

> As file sizes increase, larger caches become more useful. I'm
> considering an IBM 120GB drive for my wife's win98 machine.
> Today, the difference between a 2MB and 8MB cache is around
> $12 on PriceWatch -- a small price to pay for obsolescence
> protection and the (small) potential performance increase.

Are they only available on the larger HDs ? I'm also wondering
what may have happened vis-a-vis the 15K/rpm drives. Even if
they did offer a noticeable improvement over the 10K's (and I
*can* tell you that a 10K smokes a 5400 or even a 7200, for many
things performance related -- well worth it, at least to me) the
price premium on the 15K's was kind of ridiculous. Plus, I don't
know if spinning the platters that fast had some negative impact
on reliability or durability.

> It's not clear to me that there is significant operating system
> influence on the HD hardware caches size choice, save that the
> largest possible HPFS software cache is 2MB -- small by today's
> standards. [HPFS 386 does allow up to 64MB I've read].

If OS/2 can't make use of the larger cache size (last time I checked,
HPFS 386 still cost a bundle, and there can't be many end-users
running it), this won't ever benefit us, except while booted into
another OS.

Jordan

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 04 | June | 2003 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.