SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 26 | March | 2004 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:23:56 PST8PDT,4,1,0,3600,10,-1,0,7200,3600
From: "J. R. Fox" <jr_fox@pacbell.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: Re: in point of fact . . . .

Content Type: text/plain

=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================

Ray Davison wrote:

> If you have the actual files, send them.
>
> > Since you have no real interest in them, it's
> > academic.
>
> Not totally. I, and others, have spent time trying to explain how to
> install when only a ZIP is available. It would be nice to be able to
> just point at an executable.
>

Well, it looks like you and Steven were correct, and I was misremembering about this.
1.4.something was the last .EXE archive prior to the recent 1.7b; what I have are indeed
zipfiles. However, I'm sure that I've never installed Mozilla manually. I wouldn't know
where to begin. That leads me to suppose that there must be one or more .CMD files inside the
zip that automate the install process, and that is what I must have used. To me,
functionally, as an end user, this makes little difference from what the .EXE installer does
for us. Along the way, it may be necessary to answer some questions, choose some defaults,
fill in some boxes, but the whole deal gets installed *for me* in some automatic fashion.

By the way, it would be nice to have another reminder about upgrade replacements. Wasn't
there some simple rule along the lines of: 'Delete everything below a certain point of the
existing Mozilla tree structure, THEN install the new version' ? Even if there is such a
procedure, I expect it may now be complicated by the need to make sure we have some particular
.DLLs in the right place.

Jordan

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 26 | March | 2004 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.