SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 28 | March | 2004 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:47:06 PST8PDT,4,1,0,3600,10,-1,0,7200,3600
From: "Larry Tawa" <laror2004@speakeasy.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: Help, I'm Trapped

=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================

In <68038.19.06.29.28.03.2004@constellation.carrier>, on 03/28/2004
at 07:02 PM, "Steven Levine" said:

>In reality the boot volume can be much smaller than 1GB. If one moves
>the swap, spool, TMP, ecSMT directories etc. to a data volume, the boot
>partition footprint is less under 500MB and performance improves by more
>than one might expect.

Performance - more than chkdsk I presume increased responsiveness of
system?

Is the performance because part of the system files are on a JFS volume?
Or can the non-boot volume with some of the system files be HPFS? I
assume that JFS would be faster than HPFS.

>The eCS recommendation is aimed at not confusing Windows users trying to
>install eCS for the first time. Seasoned OS/2 users can get much better
>performance with a few simple tweaks.

Well my Windows box is now built - gonna do a quicky install of eCS 1.1
for some more notes. At the end of April, I plan to build a test eCS 1.1
box and image the boot partition with dfsee so that I can safely test the
above without getting into (too much) trouble. Each OS a different box -
I am learning.

Besides moving part of the eCS boot files to another volume, what other
"few simple tweaks" are we talking about? Thanks.

Regards.

Larry
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Larry Tawa"
-----------------------------------------------------------

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 28 | March | 2004 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.