SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 11 |
April |
2005 ]
<< Previous Message <<
Content Type: text/plain
Steve Carter wrote:
> The overhead to execute a simple beep is certainly excessive,
> but since it is intended for (relatively) slow human beings
> it may not matter. And of course, today's machines are
> significantly faster than yesterday's. [Unfortunately, mine
> is from yesteryear.]
Speaking of "yesteryear"; I just ran my beep test program. I had not
used it for a while. Still works fine. It does peg the System
Activity Monitor.
Ray
@echo off
D:\NU_DOS\be beep /D2 /F1000 /R2 /W2
D:\NU_DOS\be beep /D9 /F650 /R2 /W9
:: BEEP [switches]
:: or
:: BEEP command-file [/E]
::
::Switches
:: /Dn Duration of the tone in n/18 seconds
:: /Fn Sound a tone of frequency n
:: /Rn Repeat the tone n times
:: /Wn Wait between tones n/18 seconds
:: /E Echo text in quotes following notes
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
Return to [ 11 |
April |
2005 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
|