said:
>I'm not sure either. I may well be misquoting that boot-time message,
>which does go by fairly quickly.
This is an area where I recommend the use of simple tools like pencil and
paper. Sometimes these message go to lantran.log. If not, there's always
a option of a well timed pause key. It's not perfect, but it's better
than slow eyes and bad memory.
>applicable, because it worked. This whole slot business seems kind of
>arbitrary to me,
It's not, but I won't bother pointing you at the applicable specs.
>since we're not talking about *real, tangible* slots
Being limited to tangible slots would really limit the usefulness of PCI
devices.
>Alas, eCS won't take it so casually.
As it should be.
>But it seems to matter for boot-up purposes, or for the installer.
There is probably a valid reason for this, but I don't yet have enough
information to be draw sensible conclusions.
>I'd be happy to send you the readout from PCI.Exe. The data from the
>2nd. install attempt probably won't differ enough from the first, but I
>expect the logs from the 3rd. (which worked, except for Peer / TCPIP)
>likely would. I'd be glad to send this to you, as well as any logs from
>further attempts.
That's probably the best way. I find it easiest to work with current data
while having prior data to us for cross checking.
>I'd still be curious to see a blueprint on how one goes about installing
>it a la carte, after the fact. Might be a good Mr. KIA column in that.
It would be short column and it would repeat lots of Google hits. All
that's needed is to run the installer off the CD. I never remember the
exact name because it's easy to look up.
>just declare victory. If it is something to do with the dual NICs, that
>would be a semi-unique circumstance, since not too many computers come
>this way. Therefore, of limited benefit to others.
Lot's of MBs have dual NICs these days.
>It does leave open
>the question of what will happen when I get around to trying a migration
>install over the *other* eCS boot partition.
That is does. :-)
>And dontcha think it is
>kind of curious that we did not run into anything like this at the time
>you guided the 1.1 installs, on the same hardware ?
No at all. The installer is very different under the covers.
Steven
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Steven Levine" MR2/ICE 2.60b #10183 Warp4/FP15/14.100c_W4
www.scoug.com irc.fyrelizard.com #scoug (Wed 7pm PST)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
Return to [ 18 |
January |
2005 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.