SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 19 |
June |
2005 ]
>> Next Message >>
1
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Content Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Steven Levine wrote:
> In <42B4BF4B.4040208@adelphia.net>, on 06/18/05
> at 05:41 PM, Colin Campbell said:
>
>
>>One of the things I did was ask the tool to give me the "Sizes" graphic
>>that Steven demonstrated, for my F: drive. This is an LVM volume of
>>about 17GB in size, with about 12GB used.
>
>
> I haven't even looked at the jpg, but 3.02 is too old to handle a drive
> this size correctly. I mentioned the 4GB limits in passing during the
> presentation.
>
I surmised that this might be the case; the attachment seems to prove
it. I do recall your mentioning 64-bit arithmetic.
>
>>HELP wasn't terribly
>>clear about the meaning of the percentages, but I don't see how
>>directory 1 and 2 can reasonably have the percentages they do.
>
>
> Since the display was most likely wrong, I would not expect the help to be
> very helpful.
>
The Help has been improved in the paragraph that explains the format of
the printed report; I think it is clear now.
>
>>I went Googling for Steven's beta version, but had no luck, although I
>>tried "FM/2", "File Manager/2", "FileManager/2", and added OS/2 to some
>>of these search strings. So, I couldn't try the newer code to see what
>>it told me.
>
>
> I see what you mean. You have to scroll down to the 19th link to get to
> the Hobbes link. This would have gotten you 3.02 which is not terribly
> unexpected. I did say that I had not yet posted 3.03 anywhere but to my
> website which is at:
>
> <http://home.earthlink.net/~steve53/MarkKimesTools>
>
> This will get you to the 3.03 that I demonstrated this morning. If they
> drive sizes are still wrong, let me know. Also, if find areas of the help
> that are not as clear as they might be, just let me know what you think
> would say it better. It is best to discuss fm/2 issues on the fm2user
> Yahoo group.
>
Things look a lot more reasonable -- good work!
One difference I notice in my experiment is that 3.02 showed the
directories in descending order by size. In 3.03, the USER directory is
shown first, though it is smaller than CDWFS; after that, all the others
seems to be in descending order. Again, see the attachment.
>
> Regards,
> Steven
>
Thanks,
Colin
Content Type: image/jpeg
Unknown header: name="fm2.jpg" :
Unknown header: filename="fm2.jpg" :
File attachment:
977unknown
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 19 |
June |
2005 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
|