SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 27 | April | 2006 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:42:33 PST8
From: J R FOX <jr_fox@pacbell.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: A mess, after attempted install of WarpIN 1.0.10

Content Type: text/plain

--- Steven Levine wrote:

> You still have multiple warpin install leftovers
> hanging about.

> A correct
> installation will have only one visible copy of
>
> 4-27-06 1:10 40,663 0
> stub.exe
> 4-27-06 1:10 81,013 0
> warpin.exe
> 4-27-06 1:10 24,870 0 wic.exe
> 4-27-06 1:10 92,142 0
> wicpm.exe
> 4-27-06 1:10 717,391 0
> wpirtl.dll

Very good, you nailed it. There was a duplicate of
Wic.Exe laying around, of no consequence. But an old
Wpirtl.DLL in \ecs\dll seems to have been the culprit.
1.0.10 is now signing on. Thanks, Steven.

> >In the past, new versions installed right over the
> >prior version -- for me, with no apparent problem,
> at
> >least up until 1.0.9.
>
> It's probably the first update to an eCS 1.2 box.

That could be.

So I guess there's no point now in forwarding that
wpitrap.log to Paul, or is there ? (I got a message
bounce notice, using the "home" email address listed
on his personal web page.)

> >Shouldn't *the opposite* scenario be true ?

> It's irrelevant.

I'm still wondering what process tampers with the
attributes on those supposedly untouchable boot files,
though ? I had thought one needed to use UniMaint --
deliberately -- in order to change them. I've now
changed them back with ZTree.

Jordan

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 27 | April | 2006 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.