said: 
>You missed my point.  The delay kicks in between 1.8b1 and 1.0a. 
I see.  I did not understand your post to say this. 
> do  
>not have anything between those so that is as close as I can get.  It is  
>the same on 1.5a - 29 Jan 06. 
I suspect you mean 1.0? 
>And I am saying that in my case hardware does effect the delay time.  It  
>is more noticeable on a slow machine than a faster one. 
Regardless.  A 10 second delay between messages is excessive on almost any 
system. 
You might want to try Peter's Seamonkey build and see if it too has the 
problem you are observing. 
Steven 
--  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
"Steven Levine"   MR2/ICE 2.67 #10183 Warp/eCS/DIY/14.103a_W4 
www.scoug.com irc.fyrelizard.com #scoug (Wed 7pm PST) 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
===================================================== 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message 
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message, 
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help". 
For problems, contact the list owner at 
"postmaster@scoug.com". 
===================================================== 
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 04 | 
April | 
2006 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.