wrote:
> Bottomline: The SATA drives are far less expensive
> than the SCSI. They outperform
> the 160 Ultra SCSI and I can get larger drives much
> cheaper.
Yes, but the better SCSI drives used to have far
greater MTBF specs, and general reliability. They
were the enterprise | server drives of choice, able to
run 24/7. I'm wondering if that is still true.
Jordan
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 01 |
December |
2006 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.