SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 01 | December | 2006 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:54:01 -0800
From: "Harry Motin" <hmotin@sbcglobal.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: < "scoug-help@scoug.com" > scoug-help@scoug.com >
Subject: SCOUG-Help: motherboard for eCS

Content Type: text/plain

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 00:23:55 -0800, Robert Blair wrote:

>What is a good motherboard to use with eCS. I think a dual processor w=
ould be
>good and ecc memory but neither is a requirement just a nice to have. =
This
>computer will be used as an internet gateway, firewall, and file server=
for my
>home LAN. I will move my SCSI drives to the new computer.
>
>While I am thinking about hard drives is the SATA drive performance any=
good
>when compared to SCSI drives?

Bob,
I'm using the ASUS ATX model N=BA P5P800 SE motherboard with good result=
s.

I previously used all SCSI's on my system, but I've now switched over to=
SATA with
better results. I was using two (2) SCSI Ultra 160 drives, both 73GB. I =
now using:

1. Seagate SATA hard drive, 320 GB, Model N=BA ST3320620AS, which is a =

SATA 3.0 version

2. Western Digital SATA hard drive, 250 GB, Model N=BA
WD2500JS-00MHB0

My motherboard does not support the 300 Ms burst rate maximum speed, onl=
y 150 Ms.
Nevertheless, both SATA drives are faster overall, compared to the SCSI =
drives. I used
the DISKIO utility from Kai Uwe Rommel to make the comparisons.

I use Dani's drivers for the SATA drives (version 1.7.5). They work just=
fine.

Bottomline: The SATA drives are far less expensive than the SCSI. They o=
utperform
the 160 Ultra SCSI and I can get larger drives much cheaper.

Hope this helps.
HCM

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 01 | December | 2006 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.