SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 13 | February | 2006 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:47:34 PST8
From: J R FOX <jr_fox@pacbell.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: next 1.2R attempt | Moz extensions & their errors

Content Type: text/plain

--- Steven Levine wrote:

> Since I doubt that your 80GB drive is more than half
full

Win has that convenient pie chart showing how much of
the partition is being used. I could tally how much
of each partition is being used with DFSEE, and I
suspect it is more than 50%. I'm still planning to go
from the 80G. HDD I have now to a 120G. HDD for this
box, because I need more headroom in several
partitions. (One of the W2Ks is at around 82%
utilization, which isn't all that comfortable for Win.
You get complaints when trying to defrag it, for
example.)

, your restore is
> runing at something like
>
> [D:\Tmp\0]rexxtry say 40 * 1000**3 / 60 / 60 /
> 1000**2
> 11.1111111
> which is not all that great for an IDE setup. If
> you are using less than
> 40GB, the performance is even worse.

I can't say I follow your math, but it is what it is.
And those results are still a whole lot better than
what Ray reported to me for his USB connected drive.
Of course, I don't know what the size of that drive
was. If it was 3 or more times larger than the 80G.
I'm currently using for the Shuttle, that might tell
the tale.

Jordan

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 13 | February | 2006 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.