SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 13 | February | 2006 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:38:31 PST8
From: "Steven Levine" <steve53@earthlink.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: next 1.2R attempt | Moz extensions & their errors

In <20060213190452.63842.qmail@web81405.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, on 02/13/06
at 11:04 AM, J R FOX said:

>(XPI looks to me to be some kinda
>pseudo Zipfile.

No pseudo about it. It is a zip file, just like a jar file is a zip file.
The xpi extension is just so a browser can knows to process it as an
extension. Without this, it would be more complicated to detect when an
extension is an extension.

>Is there no archive integrity test
>for them ?

Sure there is. It's a zip file so all the standard zip file tools work.

>The gnu UNZIP ?)

Sometimes. However, like most everyone else, I typically use InfoZips'
zip tools.

>So, it's possible that my Mozilla install is messed
>up, yet *some* -- otherwise compatible -- extensions
>install just fine, while others return this error ?

Sure. You don't always do everything right and you don't always do
everything wrong. Complex applications are similar.

>I consider it very
>unlikely that each of these is screwed up -- much less
>in the same exact way -- so if they *still* don't work
>there that suggests to me it has to be the XPIs.

If they never work on Mozilla, it's possible that someone neglected to
test before packaging.

>had installed fine, but threw out a different error
>when I tried to use it. So I guess there is more than
>one failure mode for these things . . . .

Different code. Different errors. We are all going to die. We are not
all going to die of the same thing, unless we are really unlucky.

Steven

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Steven Levine" MR2/ICE 2.67 #10183 Warp/eCS/DIY/14.103a_W4
www.scoug.com irc.fyrelizard.com #scoug (Wed 7pm PST)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 13 | February | 2006 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.