SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 15 | November | 2006 ]

>> Next Message >>


Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:05:34 -0800
From: J R FOX <jr_fox@pacbell.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: browser coexistence

Content Type: text/plain

I really should know the answer to this by now, and
maybe I do, but I'm gonna double-check again just to
be sure. Initially, I will direct this to Ray, since
I think he has opined on it a number of times
previously, and may even have done a demo on it a
while back.

You can have _at least_ one each of Moz suite, FF, and
SM installed -- separate install objects and separate
directory structures, of course -- without
experiencing cross-interferences between them, correct
? Just like the eCS installer for a long time (but
maybe not still ?) created a Moz 4.61 install, along
with the Moz 1.7.x it put on, and there were no issues
in using either at will ? And, at this point, no need
for something like that RUN! utility ?

I'm not talking about Profiles here, or sharing
Profiles, which I know is an additional wrinkle to be
ironed out. And there is something to be aware of in
this connection in Config.Sys. But, aside from that,
no basic issues . . . ?

At one time, I did have two versions of Moz 1.7.x
installed, with no Profile sharing, and there were no
problems running either. Occasionally, there would be
a non-functioning extension in one of those, but it
had other causes and was not a big deal. I've been
sufficiently happy with Moz 1.7.x that I just never
got around to bothering with FF or SM, but I'm getting
to where I have some reasons for giving them a spin.

Jordan

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".

=====================================================


>> Next Message >>

Return to [ 15 | November | 2006 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.