wrote:
> The backup drive size is the same size as the
> working drive. In the
> case of my desktops the backup drive becomes the
> working drive. Drives
> are cheap, unless of course you think IDE is not
> good enough.
IDE HDDs seem to be considered obsolete. Recent
motherboards (recent being for about the last 2 years)
seem to all have gone SATA.
> > Besides that, you run into a single file limit
> of
> > around 4G -- either on FAT-32 or NTFS, I don't
> recall
> > which at the moment. I'd rather not have to split
> and
> > re-integrate backups.
>
> What do drive copies have to do with file size. You
> don't create or
> even copy files; just bits.
Apples & oranges, Ray. I can't presently clone the
Thinkpad HDD, though I'm going to have the pieces in
place to make this doable -- soon, I hope. But I for
sure wanted to have a good image of it *before* I
messed with it, and will make new ones now that I've
reconfigured the space taken up by W2K and added an
eCS install.
I *do* clone whole HDDs for the desktop machines, and
this is not as quick as you suggest. It takes me 30 -
40 minutes to clone a 120G. drive, and then I do a
Verify comparison, which takes close to the same
amount of time.
Jordan
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 22 |
February |
2008 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.