wrote:
> My primary OS/2 is still
> W4 on FAT16.
> It uses FAT16, FAT32, HPFS, JFS and EXT2. Win has never
> bothered it.
> Most of my machines have eCS on HPFS. Win has not bothered
> them either,
> or the HPFS storage partitions.
This is contrary to my experience. But I've avoided serious problems by keeping those partitions off the Win radar.
> And Win and eCS can now be
> used to
> maintain each other. Heck, I might even eliminate the
> extra OS/2
> partitions some day. That thought is scary.
I would never trust Pinball.Sys to make this two-way. Win can't and won't see or write to a partition that belongs to eCS on one of my systems. With a minor exception of those EA and WP files, OS/2 is pretty well behaved, though, so I don't have a problem letting it have access to any FAT-32 partition that is used by Win. I don't have much confidence in the half-baked NTFS driver for eCS.
> Define "for all practical purposes". I have to
> believe that something
> is either required or not. And if it is, why?
They suggest OO 2.x would be dog slow (if your dog happens to be a bulldog or a dachshunt) if you put the data on something other than JFS.
> What are you using for maintenance and recovery of FAT32.
> Like when OS/2 chkdsk says run scandisk.
Good question. I'll let you know when I need to recover one.
> One time letting W2K try to recover a FAT32 curred me of
> that fantasy.
This hasn't really been an issue here, either.
> > Don't know what to tell you, Ray. I push what I
> run fairly hard --
> > probably not by Steven's terms, but _still_
> relative to the "average"
> > user. I certainly have my problems, but what you
> refer to ain't
> > among 'em.
> So, you do a power-down and every partition comes backs
> clean, right?
When you say "power-down", I take it you don't mean just pulling the plug, but an orderly shut-down ? In that case, 'Yes.'
> JFS. It seems to work OK except
> for the crash thing.
Do you know about / have / ever use that JRESCUE (or whatever it's called) utility ? It would bother me if that is needed a lot, in running JFS, but at the very least I'd like to know that it works and works well.
> Do I understand you have a lot of media files?
Yah, you betcha.
> I suggest you don't try
> to push FAT32 or HPFS much past 50G. The magic number may
> be 64G, I
> have played with it but I don't have a real number.
> That is why I went
> to JFS and EXT2.
I have a few HDDs devoted to media storage. They use FAT-32 partitions up to at least 200G. (We've discussed this before.) No problems with this, so far. But I just add or remove or xfer stuff on them -- nothing fancy. If I'm doing something (video-app-wise) to / with one of those files, it is happening elsewhere, on a work drive.
So, I guess we do have some major YMMV going on here.
Jordan
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 24 |
October |
2008 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.