SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-Programming Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 03 | July | 2000 ]


Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 15:20:04 PST
From: "Steven Levine" <steve53@earthlink.net >
Reply-To: scoug-programming@scoug.com
To: scoug-programming@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Programming: Call for programmers - adopt-an-app lives

In <396038FA.150D@peterskye.com>, on 07/02/00
at 11:56 PM, Peter Skye said:

>Multiple instances is not a good idea. You need some kind of front-end

I agree. I was just answering your question. :-)

>To maximize throughput, _everything_ has to _finish_ at the _exact_ same
>time. You have to control the priorities of your parallel
>threads/instances so that everything finishes simultaneously. Tasks that
>get ahead of the others have to get their priorities reduced so
>everything marches in lock step towards completion. If there are other

Yes, this is all true, depending on your definition of "maximize
throughput". There are several ways to define this. You definition seems
to be "maximize the number of fully downloaded and decoded articles over
time".

>By the way, forcing all parallel tasks to maintain an "equal percentage
>done" position forces the tasks that cause the bottlenecks to the top of
>the priority list. Somewhere around here I have an unpublished paper
>about this -- "somebody" told me no one was interested in such
>mathematical treatises, so I never submitted it for publication anywhere

Wonder who the somebody was? ACM might be.

Steven

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Steven Levine" MR2/ICE 2.19zg #10183 Warp4/FP11
www.scoug.com irc.webbnet.org #scoug (Wed 7pm PST)
----------------------------------------------------------------

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-programming".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


Return to [ 03 | July | 2000 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.