SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-Programming Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 11 | January | 2004 ]

<< Previous Message <<


Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:06:20 PST8
From: Peter Skye <pskye@peterskye.com >
Reply-To: scoug-programming@scoug.com
To: scoug-programming@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Programming: QA equals testing, Part One:Detection

Content Type: text/plain

Lynn H. Maxson wrote:
>
> I do thank you as another source to point out
> to Peter that anything he codes is specifiable.
> He's having some difficulty in grasping that.

No. I'm having trouble grasping why you aren't making any progress.

I'm not trying to dissuade you on your quest. But if you'd spent the
past five years coding we'd all be farther along.

> In 35+ years of using PL/I I have yet to see an
> instance in any application area where it was
> not a match for languages specialized for that
> area as well as a match for their performance.

The PL/I Level F compiler compiled straight to machine code, and had an
option to disassemble that code into Assembler. I did that a number of
times. Guess what? The generated machine code didn't look any
different from what you might get from any other language compiler (with
the exception of unique library calls, of course). I too love PL/I, but
I realize that it is just one particular organized syntax.

The PL/I macro front-end is nice. It allows you to do things like
manually specify loop unrolling. But this requires a "spec", Lynn. The
programmer (or "specifier") has to specifically say "unroll this loop"
-- and that person has to have insight into and knowledge about the
entire system so loops will be unrolled as necessary and reordered as
necessary. The compiler ain't gonna figure it out by itself, Lynn. And
if you keep adding specs, well, all you are doing is writing your
algorithm in a different particular organized syntax.

- Peter

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-programming".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message <<

Return to [ 11 | January | 2004 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.