SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-Programming Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 14 | February | 2005 ]

<< Previous Message <<


Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:34:58 PST8
From: "Gregory W. Smith" <gsmith@well.com >
Reply-To: scoug-programming@scoug.com
To: scoug-programming@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Programming: Open Source Object Rexx

Content Type: text/plain

I take back what I said about the attributes DECIMAL(8) and
BINARY(64) being semantic sugar. Semantic crack-cocaine is more
like it, and someone has been inhaling too deeply.

> You may see 14/3 as a rational number. Unfortunately it is
> data (14, 3) separated by a division operator (/).

I see 14/3 as a FORMAL MATHMATICAL CONSTRUCT that is called
a rational number. I can (well, I used to be able to) prove
formal mathmatical theorems about the field of rational numbers.
These theorems go out the window as soon as the number gets
converted to a positional numbering system. And any analysis
that makes use of those theorems is useless after that conversion.

> As such it is
> an expression whose evaluation produces a value in some
> base-N system. That value, as you have shown, depends on
> which base-N system you use. However, in that base-N
> system the 14/3 in decimal is not the same 14/3 in base-N. In
> fact in a base-3 sytem it doesn't exist at all: it's inexpressible.
> It doesn't come into existence until you get to a base-5. (0, 1,
> 2, 3, 4).

Balderdash. Are you also going to tell me that 14/3 can not
be represented in a binary computer?

--
Gregory W. Smith (WD9GAY) gsmith@well.com

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-programming".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message <<

Return to [ 14 | February | 2005 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.