SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-Programming Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 19 | January | 2006 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:45:13 PST8
From: "Gregory W. Smith" <gsmith@well.com >
Reply-To: scoug-programming@scoug.com
To: scoug-programming@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Programming: Getting there--from purpose to detailed plan

Content Type: text/plain

> Our journey then consists of examining and changing from an
> arbitrary "have" to an absolute "need" with our tools. As a
> result the Warpicity Proposal offered one language (SL/I) and
> one tool (The Developer's Assistant). In the course of this
> journey I expect that it will change from an assertion of mine
> whose truth or falsity relies on a known proof process, does it
> or does it not increase overall productivity, to one which you
> accept as your own.

Please, please, please..................

How about a language sepcification.... (Pretty please with
sugar on top.)

Please, something less abstract than "PL/I extended with APL
and Prolog proof processing." (And no BNF or plain language
specifications in English: That would be wasteful duplication
of effort that would hurt our productivity. The complete SL/I
specificaion in SL/I would be a start.)

How about the Developers Assistant specification?

Ain't got no code.... But we have process.

Ain't got no specifications.... But we have process.

Ain't got no tools.... But we have process.

With appologies to Lewis Carroll:

Speak roughly to your little VAX,
And boot it when it crashes;
It knows that one cannot relax
Because the paging thrashes!

Wow! Wow! Wow!

I speak severely to my VAX,
And boot it when it crashes;
In spite of all my favorite hacks
My jobs it always thrashes!

Wow! Wow! Wow!

And now back to our thrash about high-level abstractions like
process and productivity. Our road trip in our 1976 Pinto to
Honolulu has no need for a roadmap since all we are concerned
with is our destination. (And why does Hawaii have interstate
highways?)
--
Gregory W. Smith (WD9GAY) gsmith@well.com

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-programming".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 19 | January | 2006 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.