SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-Programming Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 17 | March | 2006 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:16:34 PST8
From: "Gregory W. Smith" <gsmith@well.com >
Reply-To: scoug-programming@scoug.com
To: scoug-programming@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Programming: Check this out

Content Type: text/plain

"Lynn H. Maxson" wrote:
> ....
> My argument, of course, lay in not writing different source
> documents (with different source files to maintain) which
> later then either manually or automatically in software
> produced source code. but instead to write in a single source
> language from which you can produce the different UML
> documents of your choice.

So am I to infer from this that your presentation on the white
board at the last meeting was irrelevant? Did Sheridan waste his
time taking pictures? After all, what you presented was not
automatically generated from the Warpicity/Developers' Assistant
source code.

> Thus if you make a mistake on the
> "must use", you note it with the tool and you now get a
> "correct" set.
>
> If you read the above article, particularly with respect to
> changing requirements, you will note that the proposed tool
> easily answers the desired features the author mentions,
> particularly that related to "incomplete" requirements. I
> addressed that in a previous message on this day.

Well, Fred Brooks' article "No Silver Bullet" has not been
refuted by Agile Development. His thesis does not have the
rigor of a mathematical theorem and maybe he will be proven
wrong someday. Until then, let us put the No-Silver-Bullet
thesis in the same category as the Goldbach Conjecture.
--
Gregory W. Smith (WD9GAY) gsmith@well.com

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-programming".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 17 | March | 2006 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.