SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 11 |
October |
2001 ]
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Content Type: text/plain
=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================
** Reply to note from scoug-help@scoug.com Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:05:01 PDT
> Rocky wrote:
>
> > Is anybody out there using a Realtek 8139 based network card
> > successfully under OS/2? One example is the DLink 530TX+, of
> which
> > I have one.
>
> Someone else probably answered you already, but I'm using a DLink
>
> 530TX nic. Not sure what they added for the "+" model.
Just FYI. The TX and TX+ are completely different cards despite the
model number similarity. I don't recall what chip is used in the TX but
the TX+ is the Realtek 8139 which has the WakeOnLAN capability which the
TX doesn't. I was quite disappointed because I have no need for WOL and
I had standardized on the TX card. Now it's been discontinued - you
can't find it any more. Since I've figured out the TX+ driver issue,
I'm basically happy again - provided DLink honors my RMA request on the
bad card.
> Jordan
-Rocky
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 11 |
October |
2001 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
|