said:
>Am I the only one who thinks the user interface for v. 4.0 is much worse
>than that of prior versions ?
Probably not, although I'm not in that group.
>It seems spartan, offering a lot less by
>way of configuration and control.
What's missing? Perhaps the existance of the new for v4.0 wizards is
confusing you.
>significance for reporting purposes. None of these failings existed in
>BACKMASTER, which I always found more reliable and continue to use.
YMMV. One of the reasons many folks bought BAII was because BM refused to
work with their hardware.
Steven
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Steven Levine" MR2/ICE 2.37 #10183 Warp4/FP15/14.085_W4
www.scoug.com irc.webbnet.org #scoug (Wed 7pm PST)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 16 |
April |
2003 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.