said: 
>Am I the only one who thinks the user interface for v. 4.0 is much worse 
>than that of prior versions ? 
Probably not, although I'm not in that group. 
>It seems spartan, offering a lot less by 
>way of configuration and control. 
What's missing?  Perhaps the existance of the new for v4.0 wizards is 
confusing you. 
>significance for reporting purposes.  None of these failings existed in 
>BACKMASTER, which I always found more reliable and continue to use. 
YMMV.  One of the reasons many folks bought BAII was because BM refused to 
work with their hardware. 
Steven 
--  
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
"Steven Levine"   MR2/ICE 2.37 #10183 Warp4/FP15/14.085_W4 
www.scoug.com irc.webbnet.org #scoug (Wed 7pm PST) 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
===================================================== 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message 
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message, 
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help". 
For problems, contact the list owner at 
"rollin@scoug.com". 
===================================================== 
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 16 | 
April | 
2003 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.