SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 29 | August | 2003 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:28:58 PDT7
From: "J. R. Fox" <jr_fox@pacbell.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: Re: SCSI

Content Type: text/plain

=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================

HCM wrote:

> I now have an Adaptec 29160 card and two (2) 160 SCSI HD's. I'm very happy with the
> speed, access time and performance. It beats anything on the IDE side (I've used
> DISKIO.EXE and SYSBENCH.EXE to test and monitor my previous IDE setup and my
> now SCSI system).

I've had a major investment in SCSI for a long time (talking setup, usage, and performance
here -- as much as in the $$ sense). Nearly all the devices in my system are SCSI. It may be
that today's IDE or USB 2.0 have eaten SCSI's lunch re things like CD or DVD drives, or
external devices. But, when I went looking for a hard drive for a new system, I went to the
webstores of three *major* companies, such as CDW, and, among their pages of product listings
from various mfr.s, I could not find even one IDE type that was faster than 7200 RPM ! Even
the few SATA drives they had were 7200s. Well, the hell with that -- I've been using 10K RPM
drives for the last few years. I would imagine that Seagate or one of the others *must* make some

high-performance drives that aren't SCSI, but I never made it to the mfr. sites to be sure. I
just
decided to stick with SCSI.

I don't know if SCSI hard drives are still much better in the M.T.B.F. / reliability area, which
was
once the case. But what I found suggests to me the possibility that SCSI still holds the high
ground,
when it comes to quality and performance.

Jordan

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 29 | August | 2003 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.