SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 22 |
November |
2004 ]
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
5
=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================
Content Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Two bits of uneducated information:
(1) I believe that the font name that is displayed by font managers is embeddeb in the font file and not necessarily what you call its file on disk.
(2) Fontographers call a font a single weight (point size) of a single style because that's how fonts came, cast in lead, one "font" per drawer.
Martin Rosenfeld
> Next I checked PM_Fonts and it's registered. But my Font Palette
> doesn't see it, at least by that name. Hmm, might it have a "long
> name"? I opened it in EPM but didn't see any obvious "long name" in
> the file.
>
> Is there a way to look inside this file and see what fonts it contains?
> I could install it but I don't remember how to uninstall a font file.
>
> > >The PostScript files, being larger, must contain more rendering info.
> >
> > Without knowing the encoding method, there is no basis for this statement.
> > What if the TTF font encoding is LZW compressed internally?
>
> The article you cite above gives a good insight although no clear
> answer. The TTF files may optionally contain target platform
> information which the TTF renderer may use; Type 1 instead relies on the
> renderer to make intelligent decisions irrespective of target platform.
>
> Thus, a smaller TTF file may simply not contain any of the optional
> hinting.
>
> My perception is that the TTF font faces are lower quality (quadratic
> rather than cubic control) and require much more hinting to compensate
> for the "pulled curves" of a quadratic rather than the Type 1 "sweeping
> curves" of a cubic.
>
> > IIRC, I'm pretty sure PostScript came before TrueType.
> >
> > http://www.visiongraphics-inc.com/tools/fonttech.html
> >
> > seems to support this recollection.
>
> A good summary, thanks.
>
> Many years ago I was going to purchase the PostScript developer specs
> until Adobe told me the book cost $1500. I don't recall if that
> included font renderer algorithms.
>
> - Peter
>
>
>
> =====================================================
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
> to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
> put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
>
> For problems, contact the list owner at
> "rollin@scoug.com".
>
> =====================================================
>
>
Content Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Two bits of uneducated information:
(1) I believe that the font name that is displayed by font managers is embeddeb in the font file and not necessarily what you call its file on disk.
(2) Fontographers call a font a single weight (point size) of a single style because that's how fonts came, cast in lead, one "font" per drawer.
Martin Rosenfeld
> Next I checked PM_Fonts and it's registered. But my Font Palette > doesn't see it, at least by that name. Hmm, might it have a "long > name"? I opened it in EPM but didn't see any obvious "long name" in > the file. > > Is there a way to look inside this file and see what fonts it contains? > I could install it but I don't remember how to uninstall a font file. > > > >The PostScript files, being larger, must contain more rendering info. > > > > Without knowing the encoding method, there is no basis for this statement. > > What if the TTF font encoding is LZW compressed internally? > > The article you cite above gives a good insight although no clear > answer. The TTF files may optionally contain target platform > information which the TTF renderer may use; Type 1 instead relies on the > renderer to make intelligent decisions irrespective of target platform. > > Thus, a smaller TTF file may simply not contain any of the optional > hinting. > > My perception is that the TTF font faces are lower quality (quadratic > rather than cubic control) and require much more hinting to compensate > for the "pulled curves" of a quadratic rather than the Type 1 "sweeping > curves" of a cubic. > > > IIRC, I'm pretty sure PostScript came before TrueType. > > > > http://www.visiongraphics-inc.com/tools/fonttech.html > > > > seems to support this recollection. > > A good summary, thanks. > > Many years ago I was going to purchase the PostScript developer specs > until Adobe told me the book cost $1500. I don't recall if that > included font renderer algorithms. > > - Peter > > > > ===================================================== > > To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message > to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message, > put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help". > > For problems, contact the list owner at > "rollin@scoug.com". > > ===================================================== > >
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 22 |
November |
2004 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
|