wrote:
> > Looks like 32GB is max size !?
>
> I was using Win2000. Maybe the same limitation
> applies as in WinXP. When
> I find an old boot disk for Win98 I will try that.
>
> Martin
Baloney ! I have a 200G drive (ext. USB, for video
work) that is partitioned as *one* FAT32 partition.
And I bet you can find someone who has made FAT32
partitions that are more like 300G. Ask Tony.
I don't know what the upper limit is, but I read a
Wikipedia entry quite some time ago that stated this
32G limit business . . . so I conclude there is a
common misconception often quoted.
A better question might be: "What FAT32 max. size is
known to be stable ?" But then, I've had such
partitions in the 60 - 200G range (for a few years, in
some cases), and never had a problem. And I've heard
reports of 40 - 100G NTFS partitions going South on
people, so I wouldn't take anything for granted.
I'd like to be able to tell you exactly what I used to
create the 200G FAT32 partition, but I can't remember
whether it was DFSEE (probably), PM 8.01, or W2K
itself.
Jordan
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 06 |
January |
2007 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.