wrote:
> Yes, at one time or another I've run the following:
Thanks for your detailed report, Harry. ISTR that you
were likely a best bet for this advice, and am glad I
was right.
> I used combination of SCSI and SATA for only a short
> time. I wanted to test out SATA
> versus SCSI in terms of drive performance.
> I now use pure SATA. The drives are just as fast as
> SCSI and, in some performance
> categories, even faster. SATA drives are
> inexpensive. Their setup on the MB is simple
> (connect a single data cable to the MB and the
> drive). Dani's drivers work wonders with
> these drives.
> HCM
Well that's good to know, and I guess it will be a
tough choice, because I have a considerable investment
in SCSI at this point, including some never used
drives. And my scanner is SCSI, so I'd have to have
some kind of SCSI card anyway. I had settled on the
10K's some years back, and really liked their
performance. (The 15,000 rpm type were too costly to
be practical, and noisy as well.) So the only SATAs I
would probably consider are the 10K WD Raptors . . .
which aren't particularly cheap either.
Jordan
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 19 |
October |
2007 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.