SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 09 |
October |
2007 ]
>> Next Message >>
Content Type: text/plain
J R FOX wrote:
> Now this is really strange. I'm certain I had the
> Innotek V7 installed for each eCS profile -- or is it
> installed for *SM itself*, and just applies to all
> profiles ? -- and I was accustomed to seeing it listed
> in About:Plugins.
If you are using this - or equivalent - one set of profiles and plugins
control all installations of MOZ\SM\FF\TB
SET MOZILLA_HOME=X:\MOZPROFILES
SET MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH=X:\MOZPROFILES\PLUGINS
Yet when I go there now, I'm not
> seeing it listed at all. What I take to be Flash
> animations still displays at quite a few websites.
> Could it be that the Adblock or Flashblock extensions
> are hiding it or suppressing its appearance in the
> About:Plugins list ?
You do have to run Flash install in the plugins directory.
> I will also take a look under
> Mnenhy, just in case, but I had thought that
> Flashblock was simply a manual On/Off switch for
> whatever Flash content you encountered, and then you
> made decisions to accept or reject it on a
> case-by-case basis.
I have never used Flash block. My concern has been how to get it to
work, not how to stop it.
>
>
> Were you saying that there is simply some
> setting (user-adjustable) where SM reports the Flash
> version, just as UserAgent can fib for you that you
> are supposedly running Windows ?
Not "user -adjustable", hard coded, but editable.
>
> I disagree with you, if only due to the fact that
> browsing with OS/2 still eliminates virtually ALL of
> your security issues. Under OS/2, you can walk down
> the most dangerous alleys of cyberspace with no
> worries, because there are no malware, spyware, or
> backdoor nasties that any site can throw at you and
> have it stick. But you are partially right in that
> Innotek or Serenity or *someone* should elevate the
> priority of this page-media-content stuff (as was done
> in a roundabout way for PDF with Lucide, although I'm
> not aware of Lucide being plugin-able for the
> browser), before we become as browsing useless as you
> suggest.
You seem to agree that OS/2 browsers are becoming obsolete. That leaves
us with, use some other OS that has a functioning browser or "stay
home". What do you disagree with?
And your *someone* may keep our browser alive, IF, another *someone* is
willing to pay for it, AND, has access to the necessary code.
Ray
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".
=====================================================
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 09 |
October |
2007 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
|