wrote:
> There are two excellent arguments for "more is
> better".
> 2) Ridethrough of momentary line dropouts is based
> on full load.
> If you're operating at some fraction of that,
> ridethrough time
> increases (inverse) proportionately. More
> ridethrough time is
> better. After all, you bought your computer to use
> it, not
> watch it reboot.
Thanks for your reply, Steve. I'm not at all sure
that I *understood* it, but I've tentatively decided
to get a Corsair 520. That looks like a reasonable
compromise to me, but trying to stick with quality.
One (related ?) problem I've been running into is that
my UPS (which has a capacity limit of 500watts worth
of stuff being plugged into it) has been tripping out
occasionally, even though it recently had a full
service with new batteries installed. It has
heretofore been a very reliable 1100va unit.
Something else may be aging in there, and I'm leaning
towards getting a heftier UPS. I too dislike having
stuff reboot on me. And I don't want to overtax what
will be in the rebuilt tower, which is certain to
exceed the current draw from what was previously
there.
Jordan
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 11 |
February |
2008 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.