SCOUG-Programming Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 01 | 
August | 
2003 ]
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
 
 
 
Content Type:   text/plain 
"...I don't know the PM API but apparently there's something   
called a "container" which the program loads with information   
and then instructs PM to display.  Well, PM fails to do this on   
my 1600x1200 monitor when running Relish full-screen and   
restoring the window from a minimized state. ..."  
 
Peter,  
 
While this is only one of the several items in your adventures   
with Relish it does point out what happens when closed   
source support ceases.  In this instance you must discover and   
use a workaround to overcome an error which its owner, IBM,   
will not fix.  
 
I have no argument per se with closed source vendors or with   
their decisions to cease further support or maintenance.  I   
understand for-profit business.  Ceasing of support offers one   
means of protecting "their" investment.  I happen to believe   
that users should also have a means of protecting "their"   
investment when their primary support ceases.  
 
Somehow the lawyers came up with the software licensing   
agreement where what you paid for was not a product itself,   
but only its use.  Thus technically you cannot claim ownership   
for any copy thereof.  In short you don't actually buy   
software.  It's simply a catalyst for its use, all rights to which   
remain with its vendor.  
 
So we remain quite correctly OS/2 users, not owners.  Since   
IBM's gradual withdrawal of OS/2 support we have borne the   
consequences.  Open source with its public ownership which in   
effect transfers to each individual user changes this equation.    
With ownership you can opt for alternate maintenance   
sources.  You can not only detect an error, but you can also   
have it corrected.  
 
Thus open source offers "freedoms" not available with closed   
source and its standard software "use" licensing.  As with any   
freedom we collectively acquire a responsibility for its   
continuance through participation.  Otherwise it has no   
meaning.  
 
We can make exercising that responsibility harder or easier   
through the maintenance tools.  We can make it so hard so   
that increasingly fewer attempt maintenance or so easy that   
increasingly more will participate.  Clearly we want to   
increase participation to have more people engaged in   
actively maintaining a freedom.  So we investigate ways of   
making that possible.  That's part of what we are doing in the   
current Programming SIG effort.  
 
 
=====================================================  
 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message  
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,  
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-programming".  
 
For problems, contact the list owner at  
"rollin@scoug.com".  
 
=====================================================  
 
  
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 01 | 
August | 
2003 ] 
  
  
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
 P.O. Box 26904
 Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
 
 |