SCOUG-Programming Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 20 |
January |
2004 ]
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Content Type: text/plain
Mark Abramowitz wrote:
>
> Is it fair to view a REXX program as a step up from a
> batch file, while PL/I is at least one step up from REXX
> in complexity and knowlege required to use it, as well
> as the types of tasks that you should expect of it?
Yeah, that's pretty close. Rexx, like Basic, can be considered a
"simple" language. Batch file language is a "real simple" language.
But in some regards Rexx is quite sophisticated. I'm particularly
impressed with Rexx's looping statement -- "DO" -- which is similar to
"FOR" in Basic but can do a lot more. Fortran and PL/I also have "DO"
statements, but PL/I's is more robust. C has a similar statement but
the way you write it is quite different.
If you ever programmed in Basic or Fortran you can quickly learn to
program in Rexx.
- Peter
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-programming".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 20 |
January |
2004 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
|