SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 09 | November | 2005 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:44:30 PST8
From: J R FOX <jr_fox@pacbell.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: OS/2 boot partition copies not quite working

Content Type: text/plain

--- Ray Davison wrote:

> The copy is being run on the machine that
> did the install
> and made the copy, so there is no change in
> hardware. Since the copy
> causes the activity monitor to peg, and the system
> to run slow, I
> conclude that something is different.

> How do I determine what is pegging the activity
> monitor? All I know
> is open the window list and start closing things.
> This is a fresh
> install so there is no added clutter, and little to
> close.

> How do I determine what is different about the copy?
> Yes, I know this
> may be the same question, it is just a different
> approach.

I'm afraid I don't have much to suggest to you, as
this is a bit beyond me. I almost never do single
partitions, but rather clone whole HDDs, and as such I
have not run into a problem like this.

I can tell you that immediately after I've done a
whole HDD cloning (with DFSEE), if I run Jan's HDD
Compare function, the clone job has *always* FAILED
this test !! I have no idea why . . . but clearly
*something* must qualify as different, even if it
ultimately turns out to be something on the nano-spec
level. (You have a scientific background, so I'm
guessing you've heard of the famous connundrum of
Schroedinger's Cat. {Hope I got that name right.}
Isn't that the one where the mere fact of observation
could alter the experiment's outcome.)

Anyway, in my unschooled methods are strictly
empirical, as always. So I just go ahead and boot
each boot partition on the freshly cloned drive, and
run a random selection of app.s. That seems to tell me
what I need to know as to the soundness of the clone
job. I've given up on the Compare function as being
irrelevant.

As to your problem, I just don't know. I did have
something going on with eCS 1.0 where the default
Clock utility they installed was using up way too much
CPU. Uninstalled it, and most of that went away.
(They apparently switched to some other Clock program
with eCS 1.1) Seems to me you should try to run some
good process monitor type of program -- IF you are
able to -- and see what that reports as to what is
grabbing all the cycles. Peter has used most of them,
I think, and may have a recommendation.

Jordan

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 09 | November | 2005 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.